Follow Us
Home / General Aptitude / Logical Reasoning / Statement and Argument
Logical Reasoning

Statement and Argument

Series, assumptions, conclusions and arguments — pure logical analysis.

About Statement and Argument

A statement and argument question puts a proposal and four arguments for or against it, and asks which is strong. The answer is the argument that is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed; the weak ones are personal, or assert a preference, or say something that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind. One answer is recorded for each question and the explanation says why the others are weak.

What you need to understand

  • A strong argument does two things: it bears on the question that was asked, and it gives a reason rather than an assertion. Both halves are needed.
  • Weak arguments of four kinds recur. One is personal - what the speaker owns, wants, remembers or fears. One asserts a value or a preference, such as that cars are a nuisance or that reading is important. One is a general truth that would hold of any proposal of this kind, such as that roads cost money. One is beside the question, such as an objection that the proposal itself answers.
  • An argument that merely restates the proposal is not an argument at all: it gives no ground for accepting it.
  • A weak argument can be perfectly true. Sugar is bad for people and roads do cost money; neither decides anything about the proposal on the page.
  • Test a general truth by asking whether it would be as true of a different proposal in the same field. If it would, it does not bear on this one.
  • An argument about the speaker's own circumstances is weak however vivid it is. That a cousin would benefit from a scheme, or that a driver likes driving, is not a reason about the country.
  • The strong argument usually engages the other side. Where the question is whether a charge should be introduced, the strong argument says what the charge would do about the problem the situation contains.
  • An argument that names a condition - it works where the work can be done at home, it works if the town is compact - is often the strong one, because it is precise enough to be weighed.
  • Length is not strength. An argument is strong or weak by what it says, and a long vague sentence is still vague.
  • Evidence strengthens an argument when it is about the case in hand. A saving measured in three comparable towns is evidence; a saving that somebody expects is not.
  • A threat, an appeal to fear or a claim that something is inevitable is not a reason, because it cannot be weighed against the other side.
  • The question asks which argument is strong, not which side is right. A strong argument against the proposal is as good an answer as a strong argument for it.
  • Some questions ask which argument is weak. The same habits answer both, and the personal and the vague options are the ones to look at first.

How to work through these questions

  1. Read the proposal and decide what a relevant reason would look like, before reading the options.
  2. Strike out the personal options first. They are usually the easiest to identify and they remove a third of the list quickly.
  3. Then strike out the general truths. Ask of each whether it would be equally true of any similar proposal.
  4. Look for the option that names what the proposal would do about the particular problem, or the condition under which it would work.
  5. Remember that a strong argument may be for or against. Do not assume the answer is the side you prefer.
  6. Where two options remain, prefer the one that could be weighed - that gives a quantity, a condition or a comparison with a comparable case.

Mistakes that cost marks

  • Choosing the personal option because it feels honest.
  • Choosing the option that states a value, such as that something is important or old-fashioned.
  • Choosing a general truth that is true of every proposal in the field.
  • Choosing an argument that restates the proposal in other words.
  • Assuming the strongest argument must be on one particular side.
  • Being swayed by length or by technical-sounding language.
  • Choosing an objection that the proposal itself answers, such as that a timetable would have to be changed by the very change proposed.
  • Forgetting to ask whether the reason given bears on the question that was actually asked.

Worked example

Statement: Should the city ban private cars from its old town on Sundays? Which of these arguments is strong?
  1. What would a relevant reason look like? It would say something about the old town's streets, about the traffic, or about what the ban would achieve there.
  2. Yes, because cars are a modern nuisance that everybody dislikes asserts a dislike. It gives nothing that could be weighed against the interests of the drivers.
  3. No, because my family has two cars and we use them on Sundays is about the speaker rather than the old town.
  4. No, because Sundays are a holiday says nothing about whether cars should be kept out of the streets on the day.
  5. What remains is that the streets there are too narrow for cars and the pavements beside them cannot be altered, which is a feature of the old town itself and a reason that can be weighed. That is the strong argument.
Answer: Yes. Its streets are too narrow for cars.

Practice questions with answers

A few Statement and Argument questions with the full solution shown, so you can see how the method is applied before you attempt the timed set.

Question 1
Statement: Should a company publish the salary it pays for every post?
Which of these arguments is strong with respect to the statement?
  • A No, because my salary is a private matter.
  • B No, because pay is a matter between the employer and the employee.
  • C Yes, because secrets are a bad thing.
  • D Yes, where the differences are unexplained.
Answer: Option D — with explanation
The strong argument says what publication does to an unexplained gap. The others are a general principle, a personal position and a description of the current practice. A strong argument is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed against the other side. An argument about the speaker's own habits, or one that asserts a preference, or a general truth that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind, is weak however true it is. Common mistakes - "No, because my salary is..." - this is the speaker's own position rather than a reason about the company: No, because my salary is a private matter. - "No, because pay is a..." - this restates the present arrangement and argues for it by describing it - "Yes, because secrets are a..." - this is a principle applied without any reference to what publishing would do: Yes, because secrets are a bad thing.
Question 2
Statement: Should the state pay every citizen a basic income?
Which of these arguments is the strong one?
  • A No, because people should work.
  • B No, not at the level proposed.
  • C Yes, because poverty ought to be ended.
  • D Yes, because a cousin of mine would be helped by it.
Answer: Option B — with explanation
The strong argument takes the figures from where the scheme has been tried and draws the consequence for the whole country. The others state an end, a duty and a personal example. A strong argument is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed against the other side. An argument about the speaker's own habits, or one that asserts a preference, or a general truth that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind, is weak however true it is. Common mistakes - "Yes, because a cousin of..." - one person's circumstances are not a reason about a national scheme: Yes, because a cousin of mine would be helped by it. - "Yes, because poverty ought to..." - this states a desirable end and gives no reason to think the payment achieves it: Yes, because poverty ought to be ended. - "No, because people should work...." - this is a view about what people ought to do rather than about the scheme's effect: No, because people should work.
Question 3
Statement: Should the city make travel on its buses free?
Which of these is the argument that is strong?
  • A No, because buses are often late.
  • B Yes, because buses are good for the environment.
  • C Yes. The buses already run half empty.
  • D No, because I drive to work.
Answer: Option C — with explanation
The strong argument compares the cost of the scheme with the cost of the alternative, which is what a decision about fares turns on. The others are a general truth about buses, a personal habit and a different complaint. A strong argument is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed against the other side. An argument about the speaker's own habits, or one that asserts a preference, or a general truth that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind, is weak however true it is. Common mistakes - "No, because buses are often..." - a separate problem with the service, which the proposal neither causes nor settles: No, because buses are often late. - "No, because I drive to..." - what the speaker does is not a reason about the city's buses: No, because I drive to work. - "Yes, because buses are good..." - this is true of buses whether or not the fares are removed, so it does not bear on the proposal: Yes, because buses are good for the environment.
Question 4
Statement: Should the state pay every citizen a basic income?
Which of these arguments is strong with respect to the statement?
  • A Yes, because poverty ought to be ended.
  • B No, not at the level proposed.
  • C Yes, because a cousin of mine would be helped by it.
  • D No, because people should work.
Answer: Option B — with explanation
The strong argument takes the figures from where the scheme has been tried and draws the consequence for the whole country. The others state an end, a duty and a personal example. A strong argument is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed against the other side. An argument about the speaker's own habits, or one that asserts a preference, or a general truth that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind, is weak however true it is. Common mistakes - "Yes, because a cousin of..." - one person's circumstances are not a reason about a national scheme: Yes, because a cousin of mine would be helped by it. - "Yes, because poverty ought to..." - this states a desirable end and gives no reason to think the payment achieves it: Yes, because poverty ought to be ended. - "No, because people should work...." - this is a view about what people ought to do rather than about the scheme's effect: No, because people should work.
Question 5
Statement: Should employers be required to publish how many women they employ at each grade?
Which of these arguments is the strong one?
  • A Yes. Employers elsewhere have closed a third of the gap.
  • B No, because firms are private in their affairs.
  • C Yes, because equality is important.
  • D No, because I was once passed over for promotion.
Answer: Option A — with explanation
The strong argument gives both what the requirement achieves and what it costs. The others state a value, assert a view and offer an individual case. A strong argument is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed against the other side. An argument about the speaker's own habits, or one that asserts a preference, or a general truth that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind, is weak however true it is. Common mistakes - "No, because firms are private..." - this asserts a view about firms and does not weigh the evidence from elsewhere: No, because firms are private in their affairs. - "Yes, because equality is important...." - an important aim, with no reason given that publishing figures would advance it: Yes, because equality is important. - "No, because I was once..." - one person's experience is not a reason about a general requirement: No, because I was once passed over for promotion.

Frequently asked questions

What exactly makes an argument strong?

It bears on the question asked, and it gives a reason rather than an assertion, so that somebody who disagrees with the conclusion can still see what they are disagreeing with. An argument that cannot be weighed against the other side is weak however sincere it is.

Can a weak argument be true?

Yes, and that is what makes the topic worth practising. Roads do cost money and reading is valuable; the point is whether the statement decides anything about the proposal in front of you.

Why is a personal argument weak?

Because it is about the speaker rather than about the proposal. A reason about one household cannot show what a city or a country should do.

What if two arguments seem strong?

Compare what they would decide. The strong one usually bears on the specific problem in the statement, while the other is a general truth that would be as true of any similar proposal.

Where does this topic appear in a paper?

In the reasoning sections of bank and SSC papers, and in the analytical reasoning papers of several management entrance examinations. The proposals are usually policy questions.

Take the Statement and Argument test

Two timed papers on the same syllabus — sit the foundation paper first, then the advanced one. Both use the real exam paper format with a full step-by-step review of every question once you submit.

Set 01 • Foundation Level
Statement and Argument — Foundation Paper
25 Questions
30 Minutes
+2 / −0.5 Marking
Start this paper
Set 02 • Advanced Level
Statement and Argument — Advanced Paper
25 Questions
30 Minutes
+2 / −0.5 Marking
Start this paper

Free · login required to attempt the timed test