Series, assumptions, conclusions and arguments — pure logical analysis.
A statement and argument question puts a proposal and four arguments for or against it, and asks which is strong. The answer is the argument that is relevant to the question and gives a reason that can be weighed; the weak ones are personal, or assert a preference, or say something that would be equally true of any proposal of the same kind. One answer is recorded for each question and the explanation says why the others are weak.
A few Statement and Argument questions with the full solution shown, so you can see how the method is applied before you attempt the timed set.
It bears on the question asked, and it gives a reason rather than an assertion, so that somebody who disagrees with the conclusion can still see what they are disagreeing with. An argument that cannot be weighed against the other side is weak however sincere it is.
Yes, and that is what makes the topic worth practising. Roads do cost money and reading is valuable; the point is whether the statement decides anything about the proposal in front of you.
Because it is about the speaker rather than about the proposal. A reason about one household cannot show what a city or a country should do.
Compare what they would decide. The strong one usually bears on the specific problem in the statement, while the other is a general truth that would be as true of any similar proposal.
In the reasoning sections of bank and SSC papers, and in the analytical reasoning papers of several management entrance examinations. The proposals are usually policy questions.
Two timed papers on the same syllabus — sit the foundation paper first, then the advanced one. Both use the real exam paper format with a full step-by-step review of every question once you submit.
Free · login required to attempt the timed test