While measures of central tendency summarize a distribution by a single central value, measures of dispersion describe how individual values scatter around that center.
Consider three distinct data series, each containing 5 observations:
- Series A: $50, \; 50, \; 50, \; 50, \; 50 \implies \text{Mean } \bar{x} = 50$
- Series B: $48, \; 49, \; 50, \; 51, \; 52 \implies \text{Mean } \bar{x} = 50$
- Series C: $0, \; 25, \; 50, \; 75, \; 100 \implies \text{Mean } \bar{x} = 50$
All three series have identical means, medians, and modes equal to $50$. Yet Series A has zero spread, Series B has very low spread, and Series C is wildly dispersed. Thus, a measure of central tendency alone fails to characterize the internal distribution of data.
- Absolute Measures of Dispersion: Expressed in the same physical units as the original observations (e.g., Range, Mean Deviation, Standard Deviation).
- Relative Measures of Dispersion: Pure, dimensionless ratios or percentages independent of measurement units, used to compare datasets with different units or disparate scales (e.g., Coefficient of Variation).
The simplest measure of dispersion is the Range ($R$), defined as the algebraic difference between the highest (maximum) and lowest (minimum) observations:
Coefficient of Range (Relative Measure): $$\text{Coefficient of Range} = \frac{L - S}{L + S}$$
Merits & Demerits of Range:
- Merits: Extremely easy to compute and understand; useful in industrial statistical quality control charts (e.g., R-charts) and daily weather forecasts.
- Demerits: Highly sensitive to extreme outliers; utilizes only two extreme values and completely ignores the distribution of the remaining $n - 2$ intermediate observations; cannot be computed for open-ended frequency tables.